Add separate new unit gr/ctxsw_prog that provides interface to access
h/w header files hw_ctxsw_prog_*.h
Add below chip specific files that access above h/w unit and provide
interface through g->ops.gr.ctxsw_prog.*() HAL for rest of the units
common/gr/ctxsw_prog/ctxsw_prog_gm20b.c
common/gr/ctxsw_prog/ctxsw_prog_gp10b.c
common/gr/ctxsw_prog/ctxsw_prog_gv11b.c
Remove all the h/w header includes from rest of the units and code.
Remove direct calls to h/w headers ctxsw_prog_*() and use HALs
g->ops.gr.ctxsw_prog.*() instead
In gr_gk20a_find_priv_offset_in_ext_buffer(), h/w header
ctxsw_prog_extended_num_smpc_quadrants_v() is only defined on gk20a
And since we don't support gk20a remove corresponding code
Add missing h/w header ctxsw_prog_main_image_pm_mode_ctxsw_f() for
some chips
Add new h/w header ctxsw_prog_gpccs_header_stride_v()
Jira NVGPU-1526
Change-Id: I170f5c0da26ada833f94f5479ff299c0db56a732
Signed-off-by: Deepak Nibade <dnibade@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1966111
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MISRA rule 14.4 doesn't allow the usage of integer types as booleans
in the controlling expression of an if statement or an iteration
statement.
Fix violations where the integer variables err, ret, status are used
as booleans in the controlling expression of if and loop statements.
JIRA NVGPU-1019
Change-Id: I8c9ad786a741b78293d0ebc4e1c33d4d0fc8f9b4
Signed-off-by: Amurthyreddy <amurthyreddy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1921260
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Switch all logging to nvgpu_log*(). gk20a_dbg* macros are
intentionally left there because of use from other repositories.
Because the new functions do not work without a pointer to struct
gk20a, and piping it just for logging is excessive, some log messages
are deleted.
Change-Id: I00e22e75fe4596a330bb0282ab4774b3639ee31e
Signed-off-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1704148
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Reorganize HAL initialization to remove inheritance and construct
the gpu_ops struct at compile time. This patch only covers the
fecs_trace sub-module of the gpu_ops struct.
Perform HAL function assignments in hal_gxxxx.c through the
population of a chip-specific copy of gpu_ops.
Jira NVGPU-74
Change-Id: I84485ad64997270c6a0fce3c95dc9ceb0094cf6c
Signed-off-by: Sunny He <suhe@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1527419
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Fix below sparse warnings by making function
static or including right header:
- $TOP/kernel/nvgpu/drivers/gpu/nvgpu/gp10b/fecs_trace_gp10b.c:45:6: warning: symbol 'gp10b_init_fecs_trace_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
- $TOP/kernel/nvgpu/drivers/gpu/nvgpu/gp106/hal_gp106.c:195:5: warning: symbol 'gp106_init_gpu_characteristics' was not declared. Should it be static?
- $TOP/kernel/nvgpu/drivers/gpu/nvgpu/pstate/pstate.c:175:5: warning: symbol 'pstate_construct_super' was not declared. Should it be static?
- $TOP/kernel/nvgpu/drivers/gpu/nvgpu/pstate/pstate.c:195:5: warning: symbol 'pstate_construct_3x' was not declared. Should it be static?
- $TOP/kernel/nvgpu/drivers/gpu/nvgpu/pstate/pstate.c:204:15: warning: symbol 'pstate_construct' was not declared. Should it be static?
- $TOP/kernel/nvgpu/drivers/gpu/nvgpu/pstate/pstate.c:218:5: warning: symbol 'pstate_insert' was not declared. Should it be static?
- $TOP/kernel/nvgpu/drivers/gpu/nvgpu/clk/clk_arb.c:1457:6: warning: symbol 'nvgpu_clk_arb_ioctl_event_dev' was not declared. Should it be static?
- $TOP/kernel/nvgpu/drivers/gpu/nvgpu/pmgr/pmgr.c:68:5: warning: symbol 'pmgr_pwr_devices_get_power_u64' was not declared. Should it be static?
- $TOP/kernel/nvgpu/drivers/gpu/nvgpu/pmgr/pmgr.c:80:5: warning: symbol 'pmgr_pwr_devices_get_current_u64' was not declared. Should it be static?
- $TOP/kernel/nvgpu/drivers/gpu/nvgpu/pmgr/pmgr.c:92:5: warning: symbol 'pmgr_pwr_devices_get_voltage_u64' was not declared. Should it be static?
Bug 200299572
Change-Id: I0112ba3af5b858d2ce2a37a8366dcb6be1eb688d
Signed-off-by: Sachin Nikam <snikam@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: http://git-master/r/1482866
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
gk20a_err() and gk20a_warn() require a struct device pointer,
which is not portable across operating systems. The new nvgpu_err()
and nvgpu_warn() macros take struct gk20a pointer. Convert code
to use the more portable macros.
JIRA NVGPU-16
Change-Id: I8dc0ddf3b6ea38af6300c27558b60786c163da6d
Signed-off-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: http://git-master/r/1457344
Reviewed-by: svccoveritychecker <svccoveritychecker@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Move the gp10b HW headers to a new directory specially for them:
include/nvgpu/hw/gp10b
And change the code to include like so:
#include <nvgpu/hw/gp10b/hw_fb_gp10b.h>
This is part of the process to restructure the nvgpu driver.
Bug 1799159
Change-Id: Ic80ea5b7f5c280839e502e2178a345181f7a7ef9
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: http://git-master/r/1280326
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
