Make a physical nvgpu_mem implementation in the common code. This
implementation assumes a single, contiguous, physical range. GMMU
mappability is provided by building a one entry SGT.
Since this is now "common" code the original Linux code has been
moved to commom/mm/nvgpu_mem.c.
Also fix the '__' prefix in the nvgpu_mem function. This is not
necessary as this function, although somewhat tricky, is expected
to be used by arbitrary users within the nvgpu driver.
JIRA NVGPU-1029
Bug 2441531
Change-Id: I42313e5c664df3cd94933cc63ff0528326628683
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1995866
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
The container_of() macro used in nvgpu produces the following
set of MISRA required rule violations:
* Rule 11.3 : A cast shall not be performed between a pointer to
object type and a pointer to a different object type.
* Rule 11.8 : A cast shall not remove any const or volatile
qualification from the type pointed to be a pointer.
* Rule 20.7 : Expressions resulting from the expansion of macro
parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses
Using the same modified implementation of container_of() as that
used in the nvgpu_list_node/nvgpu_rbtree_node routines eliminates
the Rule 11.8 and Rule 20.7 violations and exchanges the Rule 11.3
violation with an advisory Rule 11.4 violation.
This patch uses that same equivalent implementation in two new
(static) functions that are used to replace references to
container_of() references in vm.c:
* nvgpu_mapped_buf_from_ref
* vm_gk20a_from_ref
The implementation of the following routine has also been updated
using the same approach to eliminate the direct reference to
container_of():
* gk20a_from_as
It should be noted that replacement functions still contain
potentially dangerous (and non-MISRA compliant code) and that it is
expected that deviation requests will be filed for the new advisory
rule violations accordingly.
JIRA NVGPU-782
Change-Id: I530f8d0cbe37445535b82578953eb5193ccf682c
Signed-off-by: Scott Long <scottl@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1989570
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-misra <svc-mobile-misra@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: svc-misra-checker <svc-misra-checker@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Konsta Holtta <kholtta@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Adeel Raza <araza@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MISRA Rule 10.4 only allows the usage of arithmetic operations on
operands of the same essential type category.
Adding "U" at the end of the integer literals or casting operands
to have same type of operands when an arithmetic operation is
performed.
This fixes violations where an arithmetic operation is performed on
signed and unsigned int types.
JIRA NVGPU-992
Change-Id: I27e3e59c3559c377b4bd3cbcfced90fdf90350f2
Signed-off-by: Sai Nikhil <snikhil@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1921459
Reviewed-by: svc-misra-checker <svc-misra-checker@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Adeel Raza <araza@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Add a flag that let's userspace enable the unified VM functionality
on a selective bassis. This feature is working for all cases except
a single MODS trace. This will allow test coverage to be selectively
added in certain userspace tests as well to help prevent this feature
from bit rotting (as it has historically done).
Also update the unit test for the page table management in the GMMU
to reflect this new flag. It's been set to false since the target
platform for safety is currently not using unified address spaces.
Bug 200438879
Change-Id: Ibe005472910d1668e8372754be8dd792773f9d8c
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1951864
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
The pd_cache header declarations were oriignally part of the
gmmu.h header. This is not good from a unit isolation perspective
so this patch moves all the pd_cache specifics over to a new
header file: <nvgpu/pd_cache.h>.
Also a couple of static inlines that were possible when the code
was part of gmmu.h were turned into real, first class functions.
This allowed the pd_cache.h header to not include the gmmu.h
header file.
Also fix an issue in the nvgpu_pd_write() function where the data
was being passed as a size_t for some reason. This has now been
changed to a u32.
JIRA NVGPU-1444
Change-Id: Ib9e9e5a54544de403bfcd8e11c30de05721ddbcc
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1966352
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
This reverts commit 15603b9fd5.
Causes a build break in the PD cache unit test. Not sure how this
passed GVS - must have been a race or something? Unclear.
Change-Id: Ia484a801d098d69441326fa1dd40a1c86e2e23ce
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1966335
The pd_cache header declarations were originally part of the
gmmu.h header. This is not good from a unit isolation perspective
so this patch moves all the pd_cache specifics over to a new
header file: <nvgpu/pd_cache.h>.
Also a couple of static inlines that were possible when the code
was part of gmmu.h were turned into real, first class functions.
This allows the pd_cache.h header to not include the gmmu.h
header file.
Also fix an issue in the nvgpu_pd_write() function where the data
was being passed as a size_t for some reason. This has now been
changed to a u32.
JIRA NVGPU-1444
Change-Id: Iead9a0d998396d2289ffcb3b48765d770400397b
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1965271
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Split the nvgpu_sgt code out from the nvgpu_mem code. Although the
two chunks of code are related the SGT code is distinct and as
such should be its own unit. To do this a new source file has been
added - nvgpu_sgt.c - which contains all the nvgpu_sgt common APIs.
These are the facade APIs to abstract the actual details of how any
given nvgpu_sgt is actually implemented.
An abstract unit - nvgpu_sgt_os - was also defined. This unit
exists solely for the nvgpu_sgt unit to call so that the OS
specific nvgpu_sgt_os_create_from_mem() API can be moved from the
common nvgpu_sgt unit. Note this also updates the name of what the
OS specific units are expected to call. Common code may still use
the generic nvgpu_sgt_create_from_mem() API.
JIRA NVGPU-1391
Change-Id: I37f5b2bbf9f84c0fb6bc296c3e04ea13518bd4d0
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1946012
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
The problem here, and the solution, requires some background
so let's start there.
During page table programming page directories (PDs) are
allocated as needed. Each PD can range in size, depending on
chip, from 256 bytes all the way up to 32KB (gk20a 2-level
page tables).
In HW, two distinct PTE sizes are supported: large and small.
The HW supports mixing these at will. The second to last level
PDE has pointers to both a small and large PD with
corresponding PTEs. Nvgpu doesn't handle that well and as a
result historically we split the GPU virtual address space
up into a small page region and a large page region. This
makes the GMMU programming logic easier since we now only have
to worry about one type of PD for any given region.
But this presents issues for CUDA and UVM. They want to be
able to mix PTE sizes in the same GPU virtual memory range.
In general we still don't support true dual page directories.
That is page directories with both the small and large next
level PD populated. However, we will allow adjecent PDs to
have different sized next-level PDs.
Each last level PD maps the same amount. On Pascal+ that's
2MB. This is true regardless of the PTE coverage (large or
small). That means the last level PD will be different in
size depending on the PTE size.
So - going back to the SW we allocate PDs as needed when
programming the page tables. When we do this allocation we
allocate just enough space for the PD to contain the
necessary number of PTEs for the page size. The problem
manifests when a PD flips in size from large to small PTEs.
Consider the following mapping operations:
map(gpu_va -> phys) [large-pages]
unmap(gpu_va)
map(gpu_va -> phys) [small-pages]
In the first map/unmap we go and allocate all the necessary
PDs and PTEs to build this translation. We do so assuming a
large page size. When unmapping, as an optimzation/quirk of
nvgpu, we leave the PDs around. We know they may well be used
again in the future.
But if we swap the size of the mapping from large to small
then we now need more space in the PD for PTEs. But the logic
in the GMMU coding assumes if the PD has memory allocated then
that memory is sufficient. This worked back when there was no
potential for a PD to swap in page size. But now that there is
we have to re-allocate the PD doesn't have enough space for
the required PTEs.
So that's the fix - reallocate PDs when they require more
space than they currently have.
Change-Id: I9de70da6acfd20c13d7bdd54232e4d4657840394
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1933076
Reviewed-by: svc-misra-checker <svc-misra-checker@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Benech <nbenech@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Add two new sub-directories under MM: gmmu and allocators.
The allocators directory is for all the allocator code we have.
There's a fair amount and as such could be considered a component
with a bunch of sub-units.
The new GMMU directory will contain the GMMU component (which used to
be a single unit). The new GMMU component is comprised of the
page_table and pd_cache units. Also when we migrate the chip specific
GMMU code out of mm_gk20a.c and mm_gp10b.c it will be placed in this
new GMMU directory.
JIRA NVGPU-1390
Change-Id: I7aa47ea2a32612b7d69972671fccb72770e1ae09
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1944385
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Benech <nbenech@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
This A) clears a dangling pointer which should make the code
more robust, and B) allows for easier unit testing of the
nvgpu_pd_cache_do_free() functions since there's now a
tangible change to the nvgpu_gmmu_pd after this function runs.
JIRA NVGPU-1323
Change-Id: I57db02c9e74324b8e3c3fd4a2c14565dfd0048aa
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1949936
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Benech <nbenech@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
The following error checking code in nvgpu_pd_cache_alloc() cannot
hit the greater than PAGE_SIZE check:
if ((bytes & (bytes - 1U)) != 0U ||
(bytes >= PAGE_SIZE ||
bytes < NVGPU_PD_CACHE_MIN)) {
/* ... */
This is because the nvgpu_pd_cache_alloc() function is only called,
specifically when, bytes is less than PAGE_SIZE! As such we would
only see this case when there's a bug.
So change the error condition to now check only for bytes being a
power of 2 and being greater than NVGPU_PD_CACHE_MIN. The greater
than page size check has been turned into an assert since this
should really never happen in practice unless there's a bug.
JIRA NVGPU-1323
Change-Id: I97cd701aa4f045345606b90c97a8478b4a06e189
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1946731
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MISRA rule 14.4 doesn't allow the usage of integer types as booleans
in the controlling expression of an if statement or an iteration
statement.
Fix violations where the result of a bitwise operation is used as a
boolean in the controlling expression of if and loop statements.
JIRA NVGPU-1020
Change-Id: I6a756ee1bbb45d43f424d2251eebbc26278db417
Signed-off-by: Amurthyreddy <amurthyreddy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1936334
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MISRA rule 14.4 doesn't allow the usage of non-boolean variable as
boolean in the controlling expression of an if statement or an
iteration statement.
Fix violations where a non-boolean variable is used as a boolean in the
controlling expression of if and loop statements.
JIRA NVGPU-1022
Change-Id: Ia96f3bc6ca645ba8538faf7a9fa3a9ccf9df40d3
Signed-off-by: Amurthyreddy <amurthyreddy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1943168
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Fixed the erroneous timeout message in sync-unmap and corrected the
condition for returning ETIMEDOUT.
In the original codeflow, after waiting for mapped_buffer release,
nvgpu_timeout_expired is called to check whether to return ETIMEDOUT.
However, if there is a delay between the end of the waiting and the
nvgpu_timeout_expired check, ETIMEDOUT is returned regardless if the
mapped_buffer is released with the timeout message printed. This is
an incorrect behavior. This patch fixes it by letting the refcount of
the mapped_buffer be the only source to determine the return value.
Bug 200434475
Change-Id: I8ca170c811da415c24045ab643da26476bc7463c
Signed-off-by: Kyle Guo <kyleg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1945388
Reviewed-by: svc-misra-checker <svc-misra-checker@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
This makes unit testing easier because it hides a difficult to
test branch under POSIX. This branch is not functional to the
rest of the code in the pd_cache so moving it to the POSIX
header should avoid headache of testing it in the pd_cache
code.
JIRA NVGPU-1323
Change-Id: Id5ca2627c83cf6dbbe68dd8ad7bfe9def71761cc
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1945145
Reviewed-by: svc-misra-checker <svc-misra-checker@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MISRA rule 14.4 doesn't allow the usage of non-boolean variable as
boolean in the controlling expression of an if statement or an
iteration statement.
Fix violations where a non-boolean variable is used as a boolean in the
controlling expression of if and loop statements.
JIRA NVGPU-1022
Change-Id: I957f8ca1fa0eb00928c476960da1e6e420781c09
Signed-off-by: Amurthyreddy <amurthyreddy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1941002
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Adeel Raza <araza@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MISRA Rule-15.6 requires that all if-else blocks and loop blocks
be enclosed in braces, including single statement blocks. Fix errors
due to single statement if-else and loop blocks without braces
by introducing the braces.
JIRA NVGPU-775
Change-Id: Ib70621d39735abae3fd2eb7ccf77f36125e2d7b7
Signed-off-by: Srirangan Madhavan <smadhavan@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1928745
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Adeel Raza <araza@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MISRA Rule 21.15 prohibits use of memcpy() with incompatible ptrs
to qualified/unqualified types.
To circumvent this issue we've introduced a new MISRA-compliant
nvgpu_memcpy() function.
This change switches all offending uses of memcpy() in mm/*
over to use nvgpu_memcpy() with appropriate casts applied.
JIRA NVGPU-849
Change-Id: I17be87475fde62e969b014d4d0fa455dae5d4373
Signed-off-by: Scott Long <scottl@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1941257
Reviewed-by: Philip Elcan <pelcan@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: svc-misra-checker <svc-misra-checker@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MISRA Rule-17.7 requires the return value of all functions to be used.
Fix is either to use the return value or change the function to return
void. This patch contains fix for all 17.7 violations instandard C functions
in common code.
JIRA NVGPU-1036
Change-Id: Id6dea92df371e71b22b54cd7a521fc22812f9b69
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Benech <nbenech@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1929899
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Sometimes longer 64-bit values are composed of pairs of low and high
parts in a same nvgpu_mem. Add a function to read the two and to do the
bit ops given the low and high word offsets.
Jira NVGPU-886
Change-Id: I4fe698d7c5a891ef5740ea0fb31549195e2e6c43
Signed-off-by: Konsta Holtta <kholtta@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1928206
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Update the PD cache code to handle 64KB pages. To do this the
number of partial/full lists is expanded for when we have 64K
pages. Currently we only explicitly support 4K and 64K page
sizes. Other pages sizes (16K for example) will fail compilation
during preprocessing.
This change also cleans up the definitions for some of the
internal structs. They have been moved into pd_cache.c since
they are not used outside of pd_cache.c.
This allows the following functions to be removed from the global
context:
__nvgpu_pd_cache_alloc_direct()
__nvgpu_pd_cache_free_direct()
They have been replaced by calls to nvgpu_pd_{alloc,free}().
The nvgpu_pd_mem_entry alloc_map also had to be expanded to a
real bitmap. 32 or 64 bits is not sufficient for packing 256
byte PDs into a 64K page (there's 256 PDs per nvgpu_pd_mem_entry
in that case). To prevent doing too many find_first_zero
operations on the bitmap an 'allocs' field was also added which
tracks how many allocs are done. We can use this instead of
comparing a mask against the bitmap to determine if an
nvgpu_pd_mem_entry is full.
Note: there's still a limitation with the TLB invalidate code:
it simply assumes an nvgpu_mem is a 1 to 1 with a PDB. This means
we can't invalidate a PDB allocated at an offset greater than 0
in a nvgpu_pd_mem_entry. This in turn means we must always use a
full page size for a context's PDB.
Bug 1977822
Change-Id: I6a7a3a95b7c902bc6487cba05fde58fbc4a25da5
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1718755
Reviewed-by: Konsta Holtta <kholtta@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Background:
In Hypervisor mode dGPU device is configured in pass through mode for
the Guest (QNX/Linux). GMMU programming is handled by the guest which
converts a mapped buffer's GVA into SGLes in IPA (Intermediate/Guest
Physical address) which is then translated into PA (Acutual Physical
address) and programs the GMMU PTEes with correct GVA to PA mapping.
Incase of the vgpu this work is delegated to the RM server which takes care
of the GMMU programming and IPA to PA conversion.
Problem:
The current GMMU mapping logic in the guest assumes that PA range is
continuous over a given IPA range. Hence, it doesn't account for holes being
present in the PA range. But this is not the case, a continous IPA range
can be mapped to dis-contiguous PA ranges. In this situation the mapping
logic sets up GMMU PTEes ignoring the holes in physical memory and
creates GVA => PA mapping which intrudes into the PA ranges which are
reserved. This results in memory being corrupted.
This change takes into account holes being present in a given PA range and
for a given IPA range it also identifies the discontiguous PA ranges and
sets up the PTE's appropriately.
Bug 200451447
Jira VQRM-5069
Change-Id: I354d984f6c44482e4576a173fce1e90ab52283ac
Signed-off-by: aalex <aalex@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Antony Clince Alex <aalex@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1850972
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MISRA rule-14.4 doesn't allow the usage of function pointers & integer
types as booleans in the controlling expression of an if statement or
an iteration statement.
Fix violations where a function pointer or a function whose return
value is an integer, is used as a boolean in the controlling expression
of if and loop statements.
JIRA NVGPU-1021
Change-Id: Ic5336268394ba4396ce80744c25930d2fb44dc42
Signed-off-by: Amurthyreddy <amurthyreddy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1932147
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Address MISRA Rule 20.7 violation: Macro parameter expands into an
expression without being wrapped by parentheses.
Some of the exception the coverity is not able to catch are:
1. Macro parameters passed as parameter to another macro.
i.e NVGPU_ACCESS_ONCE. Fixing these by additional parantheses.
2. Macro parameter used as type. i.e. type parameter in container_of.
While at it, update copyright date rage for list.h and types.h.
JIRA NVGPU-841
Change-Id: I4b793981d671069289720e8c041bad8125961c0c
Signed-off-by: Sagar Kamble <skamble@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1929823
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Konsta Holtta <kholtta@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Fixed timeout checking flow in sync-unmap where timeout message could
be printed while there is not a timeout.
The original codeflow doesn't check refcount of a mapped_buffer again
after 10ms waiting. So if the buffer is released during the last
round of waiting, the timeout message will still be printed. The new
codeflow combines refcount and timeout checking. So that there won't
be an inconsistency between the two.
Bug 200434475
Change-Id: Id0a0aebcb24906a1ec7113e669227788e729564b
Signed-off-by: Kyle Guo <kyleg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1930236
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
struct gk20a from gk20a.h needs defination of struct gk20a_ce_app
and ce2_gk20a.h needs defination of struct gk20a. This creates
a circular dependency.
Fix this by making gk20a_ce_app a pointer to skip knowing the
complete type details and using forward declarations for struct
gk20a_ce_app and struct gk20a.
The gk20a_ce_app pointer is alloc'ed in gk20a_init_ce_support()
and free'ed in gk20a_ce_destroy.
JIRA NVGPU-611
Change-Id: I4d62d5f2b2d1492db73bae69f90a1fe5586fba76
Signed-off-by: Nitin Kumbhar <nkumbhar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1917945
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
This patch moves the increment and decrement of the user mapped
buffer count to the insert/remove mapped buffer functions since
this value should only ever change when these functions are called.
Bug 200105199
Change-Id: I5b0a86d00e9e948c48e313153a668eb2e10fca49
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1917791
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
