On simulation platforms the netlist data is fetched from fmodel chiplib.
The chiplib has been updated to include certain pm, perf registers which
were already present in the netimage.
Update sim netlist parsing to fetch the following list of registers:
- LIST_pm_ctx_reg_PPC
- LIST_nv_perf_ctx_reg_SYS
- LIST_nv_perf_sysrouter_ctx_regs
- LIST_nv_perf_pma_ctx_regs
- LIST_nv_perf_fbp_ctx_regs
- LIST_nv_perf_fbprouter_ctx_regs
- LIST_nv_perf_ctx_reg_GPC
- LIST_nv_perf_gpcrouter_ctx_regs
- LIST_pm_ltc_ctx_regs
Bug 2916121
Change-Id: Ida8e02f97f9ae3fc3d89ee6c9e890fe5e441aaa0
Signed-off-by: Antony Clince Alex <aalex@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/c/linux-nvgpu/+/2369866
Reviewed-by: automaticguardword <automaticguardword@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-misra <svc-mobile-misra@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
MISRA Advisory Directive 4.5 states that identifiers in the same
name space with overlapping visibility should be typographically
unambiguous.
The presence of both the roundup(x,y) and round_up(x,y) macros in
the posix utils.h header incurs a violation of this rule.
These macros were added to keep in sync with the linux kernel variants.
However, there is a key distinction between how these two macros
work in the linux kernel; roundup(x,y) can handle any y alignment while
round_up(x,y) is intended to work only when y is a power-of-two.
Passing a non-power-of-two alignment to round_up(x,y) results in an
incorrect value being returned (silently).
Because all current uses of roundup(x,y) and round_up(x,y) in
nvgpu specify a y value that is a power-of-two and the underlying
posix macro implementations assume as much, it is best to remove
roundup(x,y) from nvgpu altogether to avoid any confusion.
So this change converts all uses of roundup(x,y) to round_up(x,y).
Jira NVGPU-3178
Change-Id: I0ee974d3e088fa704e251a38f6b7ada5a7600aec
Signed-off-by: Scott Long <scottl@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2271385
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-misra <svc-mobile-misra@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-cert <svc-mobile-cert@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Deepak Nibade <dnibade@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Move all simulation related code to common sim unit.
Moved common/sim.c -> common/sim/sim.c
common/sim_pci.c -> common/sim/sim_pci.c
Also moved sim netlist related functionality also here. Because, sim
related code is not part of safety build and it will work as single
place-holder for all sim related code.
common/netlist/netlist_sim.c -> common/sim/sim_netlist.c
Changed function name for initializing sim netlist context vars and
moved it to sim.h from netlist.h
nvgpu_netlist_init_ctx_vars_sim -> nvgpu_init_sim_netlist_ctx_vars
JIRA NVGPU-2078
Change-Id: Ibe3452d1595ebd8cc08ce7bd186fdf4291e40ca6
Signed-off-by: Seshendra Gadagottu <sgadagottu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2100605
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
