linux driver runs in user's process but qnx driver has dedicate driver
process, so they have different way to get user pid. nvgpu common code
expect calls from os specific code pass pid/tid.
ce/cde open channel for internal use, we use driver pid.
Jira VQRM-3534
Change-Id: I892372ac5f1dc4d25f9928d16992bcc659d12a56
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <rizhao@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1694145
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
In gr_gv11b/gk20a_create_priv_addr_table() we do not consider floorswept FBPAs
and just calculate the unicast list assuming all FBPAs are present
This generates incorrect list of unicast addresses
Fix this introducing new HAL ops.gr.split_fbpa_broadcast_addr
Set gr_gv100_get_active_fpba_mask() for GV100
Set gr_gk20a_split_fbpa_broadcast_addr() for rest of the chips
gr_gv100_get_active_fpba_mask() will first get active FPBA mask and generate
unicast list only for active FBPAs
Bug 200398811
Jira NVGPU-556
Change-Id: Idd11d6e7ad7b6836525fe41509aeccf52038321f
Signed-off-by: Deepak Nibade <dnibade@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1694444
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Bharat Nihalani <bnihalani@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
The submit gpfifo flags are splattered everywhere inside the nvgpu
code. Though the usage is inside nvgpu Linux code only, still it
needs to be gotten rid of and replaced with the defines
present in common code.
VQRM-3465
Change-Id: I901b33565b01fa3e1f9ba6698a323c16547a8d3e
Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta <sourabg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1691979
Reviewed-by: Konsta Holtta <kholtta@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Remove the usage of nvgpu_gpfifo splattered across nvgpu,
and replace with a struct defined in common code.
The usage is still inside Linux, but this helps the
subsequent unification efforts, e.g. to unify the submit
path.
VQRM-3465
Change-Id: I9e5ac697a0c7f85239ddba319085c09481d20d6b
Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta <sourabg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1691978
Reviewed-by: Konsta Holtta <kholtta@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Remove the usage of nvgpu_fence splattered across nvgpu,
and replace with a struct defined in common code.
The usage is still inside Linux, but this helps the
subsequent unification efforts, e.g. to unify the submit
path.
VQRM-3465
Change-Id: Ic3737450123dfc5e1c40ca5b6b8d8f6b3070aa0d
Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta <sourabg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1691977
Reviewed-by: Konsta Holtta <kholtta@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
In gv11b_gr_egpc_etpc_priv_addr_table(), we call
gv11b_gr_update_priv_addr_table_smpc() to convert SMPC broadcast address into
list of unicast addresses
But before calling gv11b_gr_update_priv_addr_table_smpc() we sometimes
incorrectly set gpc_num/tpc_num to zero and that leads to generating incorrect
list of unicast addresses
Remove this incorrect initialization of gpc_num/tpc_num
Also update gv11b_gr_egpc_etpc_priv_addr_table() to receive tpc_num along with
gpc_num
Bug 2099717
Jira NVGPU-580
Change-Id: Idd4e5f78dbe6ca1800efae93c66355d06417d1f2
Signed-off-by: Deepak Nibade <dnibade@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1691373
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
We currently use hard coded values of NV_PERF_PMMGPC_CHIPLET_OFFSET and
NV_PMM_FBP_STRIDE which are incorrect for Volta
Add new GR HAL get_pmm_per_chiplet_offset() to get correct value per-chip
Set gr_gm20b_get_pmm_per_chiplet_offset() for older chips
Set gr_gv11b_get_pmm_per_chiplet_offset() for Volta
Use HAL instead of hard coded values wherever required
Bug 200398811
Jira NVGPU-556
Change-Id: I947e7febd4f84fae740a1bc74f99d72e1df523aa
Signed-off-by: Deepak Nibade <dnibade@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1690028
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
We have new broadcast registers on Volta, and we need to generate correct
unicast addresses for them so that we can write those registers to context image
Add new GR HAL create_priv_addr_table() to do this conversion
Set gr_gk20a_create_priv_addr_table() for older chips
Set gr_gv11b_create_priv_addr_table() for Volta
gr_gv11b_create_priv_addr_table() will use the broadcast flags and then generate
appriate list of unicast register for each broadcast register
Bug 200398811
Jira NVGPU-556
Change-Id: Id53a9e56106d200fe560ffc93394cc0e976f455f
Signed-off-by: Deepak Nibade <dnibade@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1690027
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
With Volta we have more number of broadcast registers than previous chips
and we don't decode them right now in gr_gk20a_decode_priv_addr()
Add a new GR HAL decode_priv_addr() and set gr_gk20a_decode_priv_addr() for all
previous chips
Add and use gr_gv11b_decode_priv_addr() for Volta
gr_gv11b_decode_priv_addr() will decode all the broadcast registers and set
the broadcast flags apporiately
Define below new broadcast types
PRI_BROADCAST_FLAGS_PMMGPC
PRI_BROADCAST_FLAGS_PMM_GPCS
PRI_BROADCAST_FLAGS_PMM_GPCGS_GPCTPCA
PRI_BROADCAST_FLAGS_PMM_GPCGS_GPCTPCB
PRI_BROADCAST_FLAGS_PMMFBP
PRI_BROADCAST_FLAGS_PMM_FBPS
PRI_BROADCAST_FLAGS_PMM_FBPGS_LTC
PRI_BROADCAST_FLAGS_PMM_FBPGS_ROP
Bug 200398811
Jira NVGPU-556
Change-Id: Ic673b357a75b6af3d24a4c16bb5b6bc15974d5b7
Signed-off-by: Deepak Nibade <dnibade@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1690026
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
The pmgr code is in theory common code. However there were uses
of Linux stuff within this code.
This patch cleans that up by deleting the unnecessary os_linux.h
includes, usage of kfree() and adds several platform fields to
the gk20a struct. The platform data is copied to the gk20a struct
in the platform initialization code so that this common code can
access said data without requiring any knowledge of the OS platform
data.
JIRA NVGPU-525
Change-Id: Ic4bb6021f60b0a0778779ab5f3e15b7e5ca98306
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1673825
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
The patch adds the HAL interfaces for handling the usermode
submission, particularly allocating channel specific usermode
userd. These interfaces are currently implemented only on QNX,
and are created accordingly. As and when linux adds the
usermode submission support, we can revisit them
if any further changes are needed.
Change-Id: I790e0ebdfaedcdc5f6bb624652b1af4549b7b062
Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta <sourabg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1683392
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Vijayakumar Subbu <vsubbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
The patch defines 'struct nvgpu_gpfifo_args' to be filled
by alloc_gpfifo(_ex) ioctls and passed to the
gk20a_channel_alloc_gpfifo function. This is required as a
prep towards having the usermode submission support in the
core channel core.
Change-Id: I72acc00cc5558dd3623604da7d716bf849f0152c
Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta <sourabg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1683391
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Vijayakumar Subbu <vsubbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
We right now do not handle misaligned_addr SM exception explicitly and hence
we incorrectly initiate CILP on this exception
Handle this exception explicitly in this sequence -
- set error notifier first
- clear the interrupt
- return error from gr_gv11b_handle_warp_esr_error_misaligned_addr() so that
RC recovery is triggered by gk20a_gr_isr()
Ensure that the error value is propagated back to gk20a_gr_isr() correctly
Use nvgpu_set_error_notifier_if_empty() to set error notifier since this will
prevent overwriting of error notifier value in case gk20a_gr_isr() also tries
to write to some error notifier value
Bug 200388475
Jira NVGPU-554
Change-Id: I84c4d202a8068e738567ccd344e05d9d5f6ad2f0
Signed-off-by: Deepak Nibade <dnibade@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1686781
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
BIT() is defined as returning a 64-bit value. We use it to create the
log mask values, but the functions that accept log mask take only
u32 as parameter.
Use u64 as log mask parameter for the logging functions to match the
sizes.
Change-Id: I6f0803a7d04ee6a2ee725b5defc4cc14b5b7acf5
Signed-off-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1683818
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
If golden context creation happens before any gpu railgate then
channel creation is always fine. If gpu railgate happens after gpu
finalize poweon, but before golden context creation, then golden
context creation is failing during first channel creation with
watchdog timeout from ctxsw because of invalid ctxsw state.
To Fix this issue, if the golden context is not created, then during
finalize power on always query ctxsw image sizes, which is making ctxsw
hw in correct state before golden context creation.
Bug 2051863
Change-Id: I81d221100a099b12bad3adc2d252de4621c335a5
Signed-off-by: seshendra Gadagottu <sgadagottu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1682265
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
In gr_gk20a_create_priv_addr_table() and gv11b_gr_egpc_etpc_priv_addr_table(),
we create a table of unicast addresses from broadcast addresses
For GPC boardcast addresses like NV_PGRAPH_PRI_EGPCS_ETPC6_SM_*, we generate
the table assuming there are 7 TPCs in all the GPCs
But this is incorrect in some cases like GV100 where GPC0/1 have only 6 TPCs
And hence we end up generating registers which do not exist
Fix this by explicitly checking the number of TPCs and ensuring that address
generated is belongs to valid TPC
Bug 200400376
Jira NVGPU-564
Change-Id: I65d7d6cd7f0bf16171eb54ed71f1f3840ade3495
Signed-off-by: Deepak Nibade <dnibade@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1686806
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
CLANG, when compiling regops_gk20a.c sees the following warning:
../drivers/gpu/nvgpu/gk20a/regops_gk20a.c:464:30: error: equality comparison with extraneous parentheses [-Werror,-Wparentheses-equality]
if (unlikely(skip_read_lo == false)) {
~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
../drivers/gpu/nvgpu/gk20a/regops_gk20a.c:464:30: note: remove extraneous parentheses around the comparison to silence this warning
if (unlikely(skip_read_lo == false)) {
~ ^ ~
../drivers/gpu/nvgpu/gk20a/regops_gk20a.c:464:30: note: use '=' to turn this equality comparison into an assignment
if (unlikely(skip_read_lo == false)) {
^~
=
1 error generated.
But this obviously is fine. However, it's simple enough to work around
by just deleting the unlikely() call. We don't do anything with that
anyway.
JIRA NVGPU-525
Change-Id: I674855ad08daf65ac6d79ceab7d4f56f637d4437
Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1673818
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Konsta Holtta <kholtta@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
The patch declares globally few channel/fifo HAL functions
required for QNX code compilation (as they are being referred
elsewhere in QNX code). This is required as a part of
bringing in the nvgpu Channel/FIFO HAL into QNX.
Jira VQRM-3058
Change-Id: Ia176535b64de981d2f7ddb20f62015a0da74fd2a
Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta <sourabg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1662411
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Tested-by: Richard Zhao <rizhao@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
-Dump timeout save0 and save1 even if they could
be unreliable when fecs_tgt in set in save0 . This
is good to have for debug purposes.
-Add priv_ring hal for decode_error_code
-Decode fecs error code for supported error types
Bug 1998067
Change-Id: I60cb6902d099df4a7df45fa624e44d9e0d46360f
Signed-off-by: Seema Khowala <seemaj@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1683014
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Current code does not compute priv error register offsets
properly. This leads to invalid decoding of priv errors, and
can also trigger additional priv errors.
- add GPU_LIT_GPC_PRIV_STRIDE define
- return proj_gpc_priv_stride for GPU_LIT_GPC_PRIV_STRIDE in hals
- use GPU_LIT_GPC_PRIV_STRIDE instead of GPU_LIT_GPC_STRIDE in
g->ops.priv_ring.isr() to compute priv error register offsets.
Bug 2093058
Change-Id: Ia7c36ccba0441126784bb0e00452f2cf1196ef71
Signed-off-by: Thomas Fleury <tfleury@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1682118
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Seema Khowala <seemaj@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Tested-by: Seema Khowala <seemaj@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Instead of looping all jobs and releasing their semaphores separately,
do just one semaphore release. All the jobs are using the same sema
index, and the final, maximum value of it is known.
Move also this resetting into ch->sync->set_min_eq_max() to be
consistent with syncpoints.
Change-Id: I03601aae67db0a65750c8df6b43387c042d383bd
Signed-off-by: Konsta Holtta <kholtta@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1680362
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Semaphores don't need to be released from CPU anymore, so clarify the
code by deleting nvgpu_semaphore_release() and refactoring
__nvgpu_semaphore_release() to nvgpu_semaphore_reset() that only
"fast-forwards" the semaphore to a later value.
While doing this, the meaning of nvgpu_semaphore_incr() changes, so
rename it to nvgpu_semaphore_prepare(). Now it's only used to prepare an
nvgpu_semaphore for a value that the HW will increment the sema to.
Also change the BUG_ON that guards sema double-inits into just WARN_ON.
Change-Id: I6f6df368ec5436cc97a229697742b6a4115dca51
Signed-off-by: Konsta Holtta <kholtta@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1680361
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
Reviewed-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Accept submits on deterministic channels even when the prefence is a
syncfd, but only if it has just one fence inside.
Because NVGPU_SUBMIT_GPFIFO_FLAGS_SYNC_FENCE is shared between pre- and
postfences, a postfence (SUBMIT_GPFIFO_FLAGS_FENCE_GET) is not allowed
at the same time though.
The sync framework is problematic for deterministic channels due to
certain allocations that are not controlled by nvgpu. However, that only
applies for postfences, yet we've disallowed FLAGS_SYNC_FENCE for
deterministic channels even when a postfence is not needed.
Bug 200390539
Change-Id: I099bbadc11cc2f093fb2c585f3bd909143238d57
Signed-off-by: Konsta Holtta <kholtta@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1680271
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MAX/threshold value of user managed syncpoint is not tracked by nvgpu
So if channel is reset by nvgpu there could be waiters still waiting on some
user syncpoint fence
Fix this by setting a large safe value to user managed syncpoint when aborting
the channel and when closing the channel
We right now increment the current value by 0x10000 which should be sufficient
to release any pending waiter
Bug 200326065
Jira NVGPU-179
Change-Id: Ie6432369bb4c21bd922c14b8d5a74c1477116f0b
Signed-off-by: Deepak Nibade <dnibade@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1678768
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Konsta Holtta <kholtta@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijayakumar Subbu <vsubbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
GV100 ucode is changed so that it expects LIST_nv_perf_pma_ctx_reg list in
ctxsw buffer to be 256 byte aligned but same change is not applied to other
chip ucodes
ADD new HAL (*add_ctxsw_reg_perf_pma) to configure PMA register list and
define a common HAL gr_gk20a_add_ctxsw_reg_perf_pma() for all other
chips except GV100
Define a separate HAL for GV100 gr_gv100_add_ctxsw_reg_perf_pma() and fix
the required alignment in this function
Bug 1998067
Change-Id: Ie172fe90e2cdbac2509f2ece953cd8552e66fc56
Signed-off-by: Deepak Nibade <dnibade@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1676655
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Vijayakumar Subbu <vsubbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
For LIST_nv_pm_fbpa_ctx_regs, we right now call
add_ctxsw_buffer_map_entries_subunits() to add registers corresponding
to all the FBPAs
But while configuring total number of registers, we do not consider
floorswept FBPAs and that causes misalignment in subsequent lists for GV100
Fix this by reading disabled/floorswept FBPAs from fuse and consider only those
FBPAs which are active for GV100
Add new HAL (*add_ctxsw_reg_pm_fbpa) to support this setting and define a
common HAL gr_gk20a_add_ctxsw_reg_pm_fbpa() for all chips except GV100
Define GV100 specific gr_gv100_add_ctxsw_reg_pm_fbpa() with above mentioned
implementation to consider floorsweeping
Bug 1998067
Change-Id: Id560551bb0b8142791c117b6d27864566c90b489
Signed-off-by: Deepak Nibade <dnibade@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1676654
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Vijayakumar Subbu <vsubbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Delete the proxy waiter for non-semaphore-backed syncfds in sema wait
path to simplify code, to remove dependencies to the sync framework (and
thus Linux) and to support upcoming refactorings. This feature has never
been used for actually foreign fences.
Jira NVGPU-43
Jira NVGPU-66
Change-Id: I2b539aefd2d096a7bf5f40e61d48de7a9b3dccae
Signed-off-by: Konsta Holtta <kholtta@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1665119
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
The pre-fence wait for semaphores in the submit path has supported a
fast path for fences that have only one underlying semaphore. The fast
path just inserts the wait on this sema to the pushbuffer directly. For
other fences, the path has been using a CPU wait indirection, signaling
another semaphore when we get the CPU-side callback.
Instead of only supporting prefences with one sema, unroll all the
individual semaphores and insert waits for each to a pushbuffer, like
we've already been doing with syncpoints. Now all sema-backed syncs get
the fast path. This simplifies the logic and makes it more explicit that
only foreign fences need the CPU wait.
There is no need to hold references to the sync fence or the semas
inside: this submitted job only needs the global read-only sema mapping
that is guaranteed to stay alive while the VM of this channel stays
alive, and the job does not outlive this channel.
Jira NVGPU-43
Jira NVGPU-66
Jira NVGPU-513
Change-Id: I7cfbb510001d998a864aed8d6afd1582b9adb80d
Signed-off-by: Konsta Holtta <kholtta@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1636345
Reviewed-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
- Created volt ops under pmu_ver to support volt_set_voltage,
volt_get_voltage & volt_send_load_cmd_to_pmu.
- Renamed volt load, set_voltage & get_voltage gp10x method names.
- Added new volt load, set_voltage & get_voltage methods for gv10x
using RPC & added code to handle ack in pmu_rpc_handler() along
with struct rail_list changes.
- Updated volt ops of gp106 & gv100 to point to respective methods.
- Added member volt_dev_idx_ipc_vmin & volt_scale_exp_pwr_equ_idx to
"struct nv_pmu_volt_volt_rail_boardobj_set" & "struct voltage_rail"
made changes to update members as needed.
- Added member volt_scale_exp_pwr_equ_idx to
"struct vbios_voltage_rail_table_1x_entry" to read
value from VBIOS table & update rail boardobj set interface.
- Defines for volt RPC "NV_PMU_RPC_ID_VOLT_*"
- Define struct's volt load, set_voltage & get_voltage to execute
volt RPC.
Change-Id: I4a41adcf7536468beaa8a73f551b1d608aabd161
Signed-off-by: Mahantesh Kumbar <mkumbar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/1659728
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Vijayakumar Subbu <vsubbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
