Some functions are not accessing hardware directly
but are being called using HAL ops: For example
g->ops.pmu.pmu_elpg_statistics,
g->ops.pmu.pmu_pg_init_param,
g->ops.pmu.pmu_pg_supported_engines_list,
g->ops.pmu.pmu_pg_engines_feature_list,
g->ops.pmu.pmu_is_lpwr_feature_supported,
g->ops.pmu.pmu_lpwr_enable_pg,
g->ops.pmu.pmu_lpwr_disable_pg,
g->ops.pmu.pmu_pg_param_post_init,
g->ops.pmu.save_zbc
Change the function access by using sw ops, like:
Create new functions:
int nvgpu_pmu_elpg_statistics(struct gk20a *g, u32 pg_engine_id,
struct pmu_pg_stats_data *pg_stat_data);
void nvgpu_pmu_save_zbc(struct gk20a *g, u32 entries);
bool nvgpu_pmu_is_lpwr_feature_supported(struct gk20a *g,
u32 feature_id);
JIRA NVGPU-3209
Change-Id: I6db9b43c7c4a5054720a72487302b740b091044d
Signed-off-by: Divya Singhatwaria <dsinghatwari@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2110963
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Mahantesh Kumbar <mkumbar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vaibhav Kachore <vkachore@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MISRA Rule 11.2 doesn't allow conversion to or from an incomplete type
pointer, as it may result incorrect point alignment and may further lead
to undefined behavior.
MISRA Rule 16.x requires all switch statements to be well-formed with
terminating break statement for every switch-clause.
This patch fixes 11.2 and 16.x violations in common.mm.nvgpu_mem.
Jira NVGPU-3339
Change-Id: I002393cc64d44826e6954d1bf6af71bd569e862f
Signed-off-by: Vedashree Vidwans <vvidwans@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2113096
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Some functions are not accessing hardware directly
but are being called using HAL ops: For example
.pmu_init_perfmon = nvgpu_pmu_init_perfmon_rpc,
.pmu_perfmon_start_sampling = nvgpu_pmu_perfmon_start_sampling_rpc,
.pmu_perfmon_stop_sampling = nvgpu_pmu_perfmon_stop_sampling_rpc,
.pmu_perfmon_get_samples_rpc = nvgpu_pmu_perfmon_get_samples_rpc,
These were being called by:
g->ops.pmu.pmu_init_perfmon,
g->ops.pmu.pmu_perfmon_start_sampling,
g->ops.pmu.pmu_perfmon_stop_sampling,
g->ops.pmu.pmu_perfmon_get_samples_rpc
Change the function access by using sw ops, like:
Create new functions:
int nvgpu_pmu_perfmon_init(struct gk20a *g,
struct nvgpu_pmu *pmu, struct nvgpu_pmu_perfmon *perfmon);
int nvgpu_pmu_start_sampling_perfmon(struct gk20a *g,
struct nvgpu_pmu *pmu, struct nvgpu_pmu_perfmon *perfmon);
int nvgpu_pmu_stop_sampling_perfmon(struct gk20a *g,
struct nvgpu_pmu *pmu, struct nvgpu_pmu_perfmon *perfmon);
int nvgpu_pmu_get_samples_rpc_perfmon(struct gk20a *g,
struct nvgpu_pmu *pmu, struct nvgpu_pmu_perfmon *perfmon);
and based on hardware chip call the chip specific
perfmon sw init function: nvgpu_gv11b_perfmon_sw_init() and
nvgpu_gv100_perfmon_sw_init() and assign the sw ops for perfmon
JIRA NVGPU-3210
Change-Id: I2470863f87a7969e3c0454fa48761499b08d445c
Signed-off-by: Divya Singhatwaria <dsinghatwari@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2109899
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
- To enable FECS trace support, nvgpu should set the MSB
of the read pointer (MAILBOX1).
- The ucode will check if the feature is enabled/disabled
before writing a record into the circular buffer. If the
feature is disabled, it will not write the record.
- If the feature is enabled and the buffer is not allocated,
HW will throw a page fault error.
Bug 2459186
Change-Id: I71daf6fdb1bb67974f6e51e091f868cb08d3b0bf
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Kachore <vkachore@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2111028
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MISRA Rule 14.2 requires for loop to be well-formed. A well-formed for
loop has below requirements:
1. first clause can be empty or should assign value to a single loop
counter
2. second clause should exist and use loop counter or loop control flag.
It should not use any variable modified in the loop body.
3. third cluase should only update loop counter and should not use
objects modified in the loop body.
This modifies for loops to process single loop counter. The patch moves
additional initializations before for loop, conditions at loop start
and variable updates at the end of for loop.
Jira NVGPU-855
Change-Id: I93ccf1ac0677ff355364a718d2d953467f1d9d95
Signed-off-by: Vedashree Vidwans <vvidwans@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2108188
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Fix typedef of global_ctx_mem_destroy_fn function pointer
Error: MISRA C-2012 Rule 1.1:
nvgpu/drivers/gpu/nvgpu/include/nvgpu/gr/global_ctx.h:35:
misra_violation: typedef name has already been declared (with same type)
NVGPU-3224
Change-Id: Ic54d40f6d308ce407973c49602fbb86264776f44
Signed-off-by: Nitin Kumbhar <nkumbhar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2112704
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Fix misra errors from nvgpu_gr_ctx_prepare_hwpm_mode()
Error: MISRA C-2012 Rule 16.1:
nvgpu/drivers/gpu/nvgpu/common/gr/ctx.c:815:
missing_break: This switch clause does not end with
an unconditional break statement.
nvgpu/drivers/gpu/nvgpu/common/gr/ctx.c:785:
misra_violation: The switch statement is not well formed.
NVGPU-3224
Change-Id: Ica7029fd84f443b8ce3d51a5c5f32bb6a6172040
Signed-off-by: Nitin Kumbhar <nkumbhar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2112703
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Deepak Nibade <dnibade@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Allocate space at runtime for PMU mutex, this helps to reduce the size
of nvgpu_pmu struct when LS_PMU support is not required.
Allocation happens at pmu early init stage & will deinit at remove_support
stage.
JIRA NVGPU-1972
Change-Id: I25411877fc2fa9da5e09c9e8d84d87cafd43f06d
Signed-off-by: Mahantesh Kumbar <mkumbar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2110105
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Ramesh Mylavarapu <rmylavarapu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijayakumar Subbu <vsubbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Allocate space at runtime for PMU sequences, this helps to reduce the size
of nvgpu_pmu struct when LS_PMU support is not required.
Allocation happens at pmu early init stage & will deinit at remove_support
stage.
And also removed some unused seq functions as part of CL
JIRA NVGPU-1972
Change-Id: Ib1ba983b476ddf937b08ef96e130ece2645b314c
Signed-off-by: Mahantesh Kumbar <mkumbar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2110104
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Vijayakumar Subbu <vsubbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Renamed local variable
- sync_fence -> flag_sync_fence
As "sync_fence" is already used to represent a type.
Also, renamed for consistency:
- fence_wait -> flag_fence_wait
- fence_get -> flag_fence_get
Jira NVGPU-3384
Change-Id: Ib40d068f0ebda985303a85a385f4123955d3b4c9
Signed-off-by: Thomas Fleury <tfleury@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2111613
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
(!c->deterministic) ||
(nvgpu_is_enabled(g, NVGPU_CAN_RAILGATE) && !c->deterministic)
is equivalent to
(!c->deterministic)
Remove second condition in nvgpu_submit_channel_gpfifo
Jira NVGPU-3384
Change-Id: Icf3e460d4fe9d310d94a21895832bbfae595df28
Signed-off-by: Thomas Fleury <tfleury@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2111610
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
This reverts commit e9a6d179a4 ("gpu: nvgpu: cache gpu clk rate")
- Real clock rate doesn't always equal clock rate requested by caller
- call of clk_set_rate() and update of cached_rate are not atomic
- Real root cause for Bug 2051688 is in bpmp and gboost design
Bug 2538692
Change-Id: I9248e0c69e2271ed2d0070587db59afa6f8160f2
Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <pengliu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2109708
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MISRA rule 21.3 forbids from using calloc, malloc, realloc and free
identifiers for function or macro names. This patch renames nvgpu
allocator free operator to free_alloc to follow rule 21.3.
Jira NVGPU-3336
Change-Id: Ie9f48d567255a3e1dca70632fbe3d36b45023f3f
Signed-off-by: Vedashree Vidwans <vvidwans@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2111365
Reviewed-by: svc-mobile-coverity <svc-mobile-coverity@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Below 5.7 violations are reported in common.gr.config unit :
nvgpu/drivers/gpu/nvgpu/common/gr/gr_config.c:628:
identifier_reuse: Identifier "sm_info" is already used to represent a type.
Fix them by renaming struct sm_info to struct nvgpu_sm_info
Jira NVGPU-3225
Change-Id: I26f70a4ed2a5a845e0dc9daeb8fb5474e35d42fb
Signed-off-by: Deepak Nibade <dnibade@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2110986
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MISRA rule 2.2 doesn't allow unused functions and assignments in code.
The reason is presence of unused functions or variable assignments may
indicate error in program's logic. This patch removes an unused function
following rule 2.2.
Jira NVGPU-858
Change-Id: I80b4ae3486038de1a9b1c3afc3b4f17f18cc9efd
Signed-off-by: Vedashree Vidwans <vvidwans@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2111616
Reviewed-by: Adeel Raza <araza@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Thomas Fleury <tfleury@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vaibhav Kachore <vkachore@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
MISRA rule 21.2 forbids the usage of identifier names which start with
an underscore. Fix the violations of MISRA rule 21.2 in atomic unit.
Jira NVGPU-3139
Change-Id: I4fbed30542bdd2a2444a5619b5bb2bb5c7736472
Signed-off-by: ajesh <akv@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2111441
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Philip Elcan <pelcan@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Waterman <alexw@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Fix for MISRA error Rule 14.2
Using a comma operator in the first clause of the for loop.
The first clause should either be empty or assign a value to the loop counter.
Jira NVGPU-3227
Change-Id: Ia46d8c9a8fb99f9e49be2eb56cabef6947c5b44b
Signed-off-by: Vinod G <vinodg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: https://git-master.nvidia.com/r/2111678
Reviewed-by: Seshendra Gadagottu <sgadagottu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
Reviewed-by: Thomas Fleury <tfleury@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: mobile promotions <svcmobile_promotions@nvidia.com>
